SPAM APPEARING BLAST EMAILS AS CYBER-BULLYING
USING BASIC CRYPTOLOGY PHILOSOPHIES TO WHICH I HAVE ONLY A BASIC UNDERSTANDING OF, HOWEVER MIS-SPELLINGS, TRANSPOSED LETTER, EACH OTHER WORD SIGNIFICANCE, EMBEDDED SIGNIFICANCE IN WHAT APPEAR TO BE A NON-NONSENSICAL PASSAGE OF FREE FLOWING GIBBERISH.
Cryptography is the study and practice of hiding information. There are a few examples of cryptography that are used in business and government to help prevent unwanted disclosure of messages and other types of information. Find out information on the most popular types and how they are used.
The practice of key phrases and keywords with mis-spellings infused in a contextual message apparent gibberish is a primitive form of cytology. By the appearance of SPAM most users will dis-regard the communication, and thus never see the true context of the message. Terrorist have even used hiding hidden message inside the REMARK comments of HTML or other mark-up languages, thereby hiding their message in code that never appears on a web-page.
This type of philosophy can also be used in cuber-bullying if the receiver is tuned into that fact that the SPAM may have an alterer motive.
I self-presented at FBI Field Office Boston and was told that I definitely had cyber crimes against me, however since there were non-financial related there was not much the FBI cyber team could due. The FBI agent said, “All as you have at this point is cyber-crimes... Can you stay off Facebook and email.” Which, based upon my occupational skills set this is like saying lose your entire marketability and cave to the perpetrators. I am rarely on Facebook and my time in social media (outside of gay hookup sites!) is limited! This appears another technique by the anti-Shaun perpetrators to intimidate. One would question, why was the FBI Agent so affirmative in that I had cyber-crimes. Perhaps pursue the 300+ emails and only with someone with intimate knowledge of my life could incorporate such keyword and key phrase relevances. I have tried to decipher a few to give you an example. The FBI Agent closed with a very assertive tone, “DO YOU THINK IT WOULD BE YOUR BROTHER TO PHYSICALLY HARM YOU?” to which I answered after a brief pause, “NO.. He is part of this but he would not be the one to physically harm me. I was under the impression that answering this in the affirmative would put him on restricted duty or elevate the situation beyond which what my intent was. I was only looking for a jurisdictional law enforcement agency to look at the potential evidence I had and determine relevance, it evidentary value, and identify the perpetrators to stop the aggression against me.
Gay Lifestyle, Bipolar & ADHD
“The Shaun O’Donoghue Dilemma”
(c) 2015. Shaun T. O’Donoghue. ** ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ** | www.shaunod.us Updated, MAY 15 2015
Your IP is: