UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
RESPONSE LETTER WITH WEIRD “SIGN HERE”
POST-IT NOTES, ENCLOSURES
AND CLOSING PHRASE
“WE REGRET WE ARE UNABLE TO RESPOND FURTHER AT THIS TIME”
DOES SIGN HERE mean “a sign - Ace of Base - I saw the sign!!!” rather than SIGN as in signature. These seems to have no place on a document not authored by their office
THE ENCLOSURES SO CONSPICUOUSLY DENOTED ON THE LETTER COMMUNICATION WHERE OF 1] A DOJ WEBSITE ON PUBLIC CORRUPTION BEING TOP PRIORITY AND 2] AN APPARENT ON-GOING MATTER OF US v. COMM OF MASS (ORTIZ v. COAKLEY) WITH REGARDS TO A MA STATE TROOPER REVEALING PROTECTED CORI INFORMATION WHERE THE ALLEGED VICTIMS PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYER WAS FURNISHED CORI INFORMATION UNLAWFULLY (see CORI CJIS). THE VICTIM WAS NOT ON-BOARDED BY THE PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYER. THIS SEEMS TO TIE A FAKE CRIMINAL HISTORY LINKING TO ME AND THREE SUDDEN, UNEXPLAINABLE JOB LOSSES.
IT SEEMS FROM THE ENCLOSURES THE US ATTORNEY (AND REPORTING PARALEGALS) UNDERSTOOD THE EXACT ESSENCE OF MY COMMUNICATION. WHY WOULD THEY PROVIDE SUCH ENCLOSURES? LITIGATORS LITIGATORS INCLUDING THE US ATTY CRAFT LEGAL MESSAGES AND DOCUMENTS AS A CORE COMPETENCY OF THEIR PROFESSION. SIMILAR TO ADVERTISING CRAFTING CONSUMER MESSAGING THESE ARE WITH INTENT.
WHY WEREN'T THE SIGN HERE POST-IT NOTES REMOVED BEFORE MAILING? WHY ATTACHED TO A COMMUNICATION NOT AUTHORED BY THEM?
LEGAL COMMUNICATION | PERHAPS CASE LAW RESEARCH WAS THE CLOSEST TO THE VIOLATIONS BEING PERPETUATED AGAINST ME.
A possible scenario is that Anti-Shaun perpetrators are disparaging me to 3rd parties, employers, prospective employers, friends, etc. and referencing this SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT fictitious record which links to me. Ad agencies would use commercial criminal background checks and it is customary for a person with my title/position to consent to background checks not being authorized to receive CORI information. Employment law allows them to ask if you have ever been convicted of a felony... The timing (cira 2006) is the exact time frame of the first severing, followed by a second which involved a police officer being present when I was discharged. (VERY ODD). I have no criminal convictions, no CORI information that would subject of dissemination by any person, public agency or private agency to the public. Minor larceny by checks where all dismissed. The US Capitol Police spoke directly with the SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT and in-line with the communication I received from them, my identity does not match the criteria for anyone in their database. To date, a satisfactory reason for this linking to me and the investigation being conducted by the US Capitol Police, Intel division are CLASSIFIED therefore incident reports are fairly non-substantive to the full scope of the incident events.
At least four persons known to me (S.C., A.G., M.B., D.P.) worked as police dispatchers or within the court system and would have access to restricted information. Additionally, my brother, M.O. is a Probation Officer for the NH DEPT OF CORRECTION and on boarded to the FBI SAFE STREET TASK FORCE.
Comments like you have had severe civil rights violations occur against you. Stating with emphasis added that I needed to go to the ACLU. Also stating wish I could tell you to take the car and drive far, far away - as if I was headed back into the bee’s nest further indicating that the false police report by Marlboro PD, County of Middlesex, Commonwealth of Massachusetts went so far as to have the US Capitol Police state that Marlboro Police were playing games and that prompted them to lock them out of NCIC for three-days, specific to the motor vehicle in case they attempted to re-enter it. They undeniably stated they knew at on-set this was not an issue of me being off my bipolar medication as I believe the perpetrators are using to shield their criminal activity. The catalyst for aggressively attempting to find persons who may have knowledge of these criminal activities may be under official oppression, and this requires an in-depth comprehensive investigation by a law enforcement agency. The US SENATE has complete oversight of the US DEPT OF JUSTICE. After stating they would take custody of the binder, there was a change of the minds, stating “We could book this into the police evidence / property room but the reality is that no congressional leader is going to come to the police property room and claim it and after two years it will be incinerated. They closed by saying I would suggest you finish your business in the District and leave as soon as possible so you don’t have anymore PROBLEMS. He also said on leaving - btw, if you were just anyone we would have arrested you, impounded the car, and sorted it out at the station. Minutes from departing the Capitol complex I was in awe when two US PARK POLICE helicopters made an “airwolf” like maneuver at me (at tree line height) and both used their spot light to send a “blink blink”, My research into VFR (Visual Flight Rules) and visual light indicators and there meaning could not be found. The “Response Document” or later-renamed to be in-line with the US Capitol Police term for the information, was my sole intent on going to Washington DC - to place the binder and over 128Gb of data along with three DVDs which document the weird occurrences, web hits from government / military / ISP security / communication providers (AT&T, Verizon, Worldcom/MCI) with one web hit that from the US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES that occurred prior to any action / binders / or website(other than self notes and self-assessment for medical purposes) that prompted a demeanor by my sister of being “scared” and my brother Mark’s assertion that it was for demographics. There comments (documented herein) could have been discussed and explained and how my sister could assert that porn I watch is disgusting seems to only point in one direction... unlawfully being under surveillance - to which a police officer in their privileged position would have access to. When the fake criminal history linked from SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT he said “Well.. I am probably wanted for murder out of Dallas!!!!” hehe minimizing my anxiety over this. I think his lack of sincerity can be seen in his timed SMS with his first born child with a teddy bear to which I did not purchase and only days before had they received the Vermont Teddy Bear that I sent. My response to his SMS was “Where is Teddy” to which he never responded.... Odd for someone who rarely sends me a SMS / TXT or calls. And most bizarre in it’s suspicious timing is Alan Beck’s early AM (12:15 am on about) that I received at the EXACT instance I was told my rapid HIV test result of being positive. There is no reasonable explanation for me being positive on both HEP C and HIV as I was not engaging in shared needles or was intercourse occurring as I was emotionally shutting down in the confusion. I in-fact would go into online connections as a “venue of discovery” as superficial people made comments suggesting - if not totally confirming a conspicuous symptom and friends / relationships for the most part avoided the issue and supplied no feedback. The issue - not all that severe was just the loss of personality in the reverse effects of “speed” and a series of failed coping mechanism to try to distract from “pain”. (mostly intellectual). Why in this Code of Silence - Line of Blue that law enforcement shares would they reveal their negative opinion of Marlboro Police. Why tell me they recinded the car from NCIC out of standard operating procedure, locked Marlboro out for three days apparently in their game playing they might try a re-entry to cause me hardship and immediately discount Marlboro’s assertion that I did not have my driver’s license when they had pulled my digital picture from State of Florida which had been sent out in an all agency BOLO to all US Capitol Police. Why would I have knowledge of Marlboro PD’s statement? The unidentified US Capitol Police officer / Intel or whatever division was pulled off the street and participated in the informational interview saying I told you the first time I was impressed that you came to the USCP and I am once again impressed - you did the right thing.
TWO COMMUNICATIONS FROM COMM OF MASS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY A. PHILIPS, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL CRIMINAL BUREAU r
Since police standard operating procedure and related documents clearly indicate the Special Agent in Charge and his division being INTEL - it is clear that the public incident reports available from the USCP are conspicuously absent of both Special Agent Vieth (before transfer was the Special Agent In Charge of investigating all threats made against Congressional Leaders and their families in the TREAT ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION DIVISION, and Special Agent Van Alstine who self-stated being an INTELLIGENCE agent and which aligns with the detainee paperwork. The lack of substance in the police reports are evident that police reports of the incident(s) are being held by INTEL and only INTEL agents can access those reports - shielding even their own Special Agents from other divisions (call from S.A. Vieth in NYC unable to access incident #1 report). Call and email records so continuum communications from incident #2 to present day. Why are they investing so much energy to my issue. If I was just bipolar wouldn't they give a deposition that they gave my binder due diligence but found no merit to any illegal actions being perpetrated against me.
Despite the Anti-Shaun perpetrators they apparently do not have such high level access to prevent numerous favorable outcomes by many different agencies. I do not want to focus totally on the hardship with a belief that someone is looking out for me who has equal or higher level access than the perpetrators. Who provided for “a more true and accurate level of information to cause a complete demeanor change by the Massachusetts State Police. What were they trying to figure out that morning - a Judge who could be trusted? Was this the reason for the Court over-extending courtesy (3.5 weeks to clear defaults on my own recognizance - with no apparent contact with Marlboro and a clerk (Judge’s) who at the Judge’s instructions gave my parents her direct line in case anything were to happen they were to call her immediately. Most defaults require immediate appearance with no bail. It was apparent that there were discussions about my matters prior to appearing before the Judge. The court transport by a State Trooper had total concern for my welfare, apologetic in nature and asking me not to hold a grudge against the State Trooper (identified as #3111) because he only had the information he had at that time. The two cruiser traffic stop when P.J. was not speeding (in my assessment) and the lie about not having my seat belt on which allowed them to ask for my identification. And “I don’t want to hear about your 1992 FBI commendation”. Odd, since I never mistake when I received it - being 1990 - this seemed very per-ocestarted. P.J. was not cited for speeding and apparently told I was arrested for drugs.
For P.J. to by email contact B.W. who in turn called my parents house who then called my brother (who never answers his phone - a critical statement from my dad on many occasions)....all at 1:30 a.m. Each of the people in the communication chain are notorious for letting their phone’s go to voicemail. M.O. apparently only found out at which court I would be appearing.
Read Attorney General Janet Reno’s US Dept of Justice Document “Principles of Promoting Police Integrity”
which may have been updated to reflect changing of the guard but content should be just as effective across administrations.
Gay Lifestyle, Bipolar & ADHD
“The Shaun O’Donoghue Dilemma”
(c) 2015. Shaun T. O’Donoghue. ** ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ** | www.shaunod.us Updated, MAY 15 2015
Your IP is: